klownhole



drawing symmetrical pentagrams is really hard. props to the metalhead kids in detention.

Via ONLY THE YOUNG DIE YOUNG


To Creed, the partnership between Taco Bell and Frito-Lay is more than a one-off collaboration. Like Android is to Google or iOS is to Apple, Doritos-based flavors represent a whole new framework for Taco Bell to build on. “It’s not just a product; it’s now a platform—Nacho Cheese, Cool Ranch, Flamas,” Creed beams. “We’re going to blow everyone away in the next few years in terms of how big this idea and platform will become.

Deep Inside Taco Bell’s Doritos Locos Taco | Fast Company (via thisistheverge) Via The Verge



RAGNAR HAD INDEED RETURNED

(Source: vloktburz)



This will be funny.


Via My Corner of the Universe


What Wouldn’t Jesus Do?


Via Jonno vs the internet



A Stupidity-Based Theory of Organizations - introducing Functional Stupidity

futuramb:

Almost every day I meet people who wonders why their organizations doesn’t work as well as they should when it comes to productivity, quality performance or innovation. Not seldom the lack of creative people is perceived to be the problem. Sometimes it is the lack of knowledge or not having the enough intelligent or talented employees.

But is that analysis really correct?

Maybe it is the other way round? If we think about it, employees have never been as informed and educated as they are today. Neither are they more stupid, at least if we believe in the Flynn effect, which states that IQ is gradually and substantially rising over time.

Furthermore we seems to believe that just because the employees are more X, where X can be e g educated, skilled, knowledgeable talented, creative or maybe intelligent, the organization will also be more X. Or at least a raised X will have some positive effect on the organization. 

But what if it was exactly the opposite and the organizational capabilities would benefit from people who where less X?

Mats Alvesson and André Spicer suggests that we at least should have a more nuanced view of how we think knowledge and smartness relates to organizational performance in their recently published a paper by the name “A Stupidity-Based Theory of Organizations” in Journal of Management Studies.

Functional stupidity is organizationally-supported lack of reflexivity, substantive reasoning, and justification. It entails a refusal to use intellectual resources outside a narrow and ‘safe’ terrain. It can provide a sense of certainty that allows organizations to function smoothly. This can save the organization and its members from the frictions provoked by doubt and reflection. Functional stupidity contributes to maintaining and strengthening organizational order. It can also motivate people, help them to cultivate their careers, and subordinate them to socially acceptable forms of management and leadership. Such positive outcomes can further reinforce functional stupidity. However, functional stupidity can also have negative consequences such as trapping individuals and organizations into problematic patterns of thinking, which engender the conditions for individual and organizational dissonance. These negative outcomes may prompt individual and collective reflexivity in a way that can undermine functional stupidity.

For a more easy overview and comment on the issue read article in Financial Times.

:-|

Via Emergent Futures Tumblelog

115
To Tumblr, Love PixelUnion